Even in the often-convoluted context of Pakistan cricket, the call to drop Wasim Akram – arguably the greatest left-arm bowler of all time – from the tour of England was as ill-conceived as the thought that the Pakistan team would be complete without
Adnan Sipra01-May-2001
WasimAkram – one of the all time greats
Photo CricInfo
Even in the often-convoluted context of Pakistan cricket, the call to drop Wasim Akram – arguably the greatest left-arm bowler of all time – from the tour of England was as ill-conceived as the thought that the Pakistan team would be complete without him.Akram has suffered on many counts in recent years on and off the field, sometimes for reasons not entirely in his control. However, none could havebeen more galling than the “new found” realisation that, after almost 17 distinguished years in the international arena, his inclusion in the team would rest on a “selectorial” policy allegedly reliant on the whims of a new captain and not on his proven ability as the most complete fast bowler of his time.There shouldn’t ordinarily be anything new about a captain insisting on theinclusion or, as in this case, the exclusion of a certain player during theselection process: the over-riding consideration being the formation of thebest possible team. But that would be in an ideal world, where the selectorswould take recourse to the captain’s opinion before deciding upon the oddberth left unfulfilled – other positions being more or less accounted for -and decide accordingly. In most such cases, the player(s) under review wouldhave been fringe cases: a drop here and a push there would merely serve asencouragement no matter which way it is considered.In Akram’s case, a review such as this, if true, would amount to merecondemnation, a perception reinforced by what appears to be a concerted mediacampaign to discredit his playing ability, now that it is evident there isnothing off the field to hold against him. Still, it was diligently pursued bythe print media, inspired, it would appear, by a misplaced, often hawkishbelief in the strength it wields in moulding public opinion and, indeed, inforcing the board’s hand to suit their own devices, whatever they may be.They have been helped, in no small manner, by the new captain’s surprisingdisposition for allowing his bias against this selection to be made public:first, via reports filtering through the increasingly porous PCB set-up andthen, according to comments he made in an interview with a cricket web-site.It might have taken the PCB Chairman’s veto power to restore Wasim to thetouring squad but, and sadly, it’ll take slightly more to erode Waqar’serroneous assumption that an actual playing eleven in a Test in England canget by without Akram’s presence.Experience in England’s often fickle conditions is the key here. Waqar needn’tlook far for a history lesson. Terry Alderman distinguished himself during the1981 English summer, when a certain Ian Botham’s heroics overturned a promising Australian beginning to the six-test Ashes series into an astonishing loss, bagging 42 wickets. Eight years later, he was plucked from the bowling scrap heap by captain Allan Border, who had borne close witness to the swing bowler’s amazing prowess from specialist catching positions in 1981 – and included in the squad for the 1989 Ashes. Alderman revelled in familiar conditions, making the ball seam and swing prodigiously as he captured 41 wickets; his efforts ensuring that this time, Australia won the rubber.
Wasim- all round experience
Photo CricInfo
Akram’s might be a different case – no relegation to the scrap heap for thisclass of bowler – but the same principle applies; a fact Waqar should be wellaware of. Signed up by Lancashire during his first England tour in 1987, underthe watchful tutelage of Imran Khan, Wasim Akram struggled with a groin injurythat plagued him through his first season with the county a year later (andindeed for the next few years). But his talents, both as a bowler and a batsman, came to feature as the highlights of every subsequent season he played for that county.In between were the visits with the Pakistan team, in 1992 and 1996. The firstwhen, as the senior partner of the “W’s” pairing, he and Waqar tore anunsuspecting England team asunder with extremely fast swing bowling and thesecond, when, as captain, he led his team to a 2-0 win in three tests. On bothoccasions, Waqar walked away with more acclaim, rightly by virtue of hisquicker, surprisingly accurate bowling. Yet his successes might not have beenpossible without the relentless pressure applied by Wasim at the other end,restraining himself from going flat out while he concentrated, as only he could, on softening the opposition up with clever variations in pace and swing.This, of course, is the hallmark of a truly great bowler. Just as Richard Hadlee when advanced in years cut down on his pace and concentrated onextracting the maximum from the seam. And Imran focused on keeping the shineon one side of the ball, enabling him to swing it at a reasonably nippy clip.More recently, Courtney Walsh has shown how pace, per se, has nothingto do with his 182 wickets in 39 Tests after attaining the age of 35.All he had to do was employ the technique perfected during almost two decadesat international level: endless accuracy combined with an oh-so-subtle change in pace and the ability to make the ball dart around off the pitch.Wasim exhibited all these traits much before he’d reached twenty-five. Ofcourse, he had recourse, just as Waqar did later, to Imran’s ready advicethrough his years of apprenticeship. But unlike Waqar – about whom Mike Selveywrote in 1993 after he’d devastated Surrey with another fearsome display ofquick bowling, that he didn’t need a particular surface to help him benefitbecause he was so quick through the air – Akram’s unique ability to make theball do disconcertingly different tricks off a short run-up promises a muchbrighter future than any misdirected press reports would have us believe,especially in England. Waqar would do well to pay heed.